Evaluating the Open Source SOA Opportunity

06/04/09

Evaluating the Open Source SOA Opportunity

The solutions now offered in Open Source for implementing SOA have begun to provide extensive value but customers and systems integrators should be cautious and think strategically when assessing the value of these solutions. Projects such as WS02 and semi-open source (non-GPL, non-BSD, non-Apache) solutions such as Intalio BPMS are now comparable and even superior to many or even all their closed source counterparts. Considering some of the open source licenses offered by vendors it is necessary to take a cautious and well informed approach to open source offerings. Many of these solutions are contrived contributions that do not have a strong 3rd party developer community and are principally developed by one vendor with the dubious goal of proliferating their software and gaining the mind-share of the broader developer community. In my opinion the strategic focus of customers seeking open source solutions should be on those open source vendors licensing completely open and community driven software licenses along with support and subscription based licensing. In general customers should be cautions of vendors offering so called open source or community editions and a so called closed source enterprise edition. Watch this space for updates.

Trackback address for this post:

This is a captcha-picture. It is used to prevent mass-access by robots.
Please enter the characters from the image above. (case insensitive)

Comments, Trackbacks, Pingbacks:

Comment from: Ann [Visitor] Email · http://www.google.com
Thanks for information!
PermalinkPermalink 02/17/10 @ 19:24
Comment from: david [Member] Email
Hey no problem. Another thing to be aware of is escalating support licensing costs. This typically happens when you seek to provide tier 2 support for a series of products to fulfill a complete SOA footprint. Often these costs escalate to a similar level to that provided by commercial vendors (other than the once off up front licensing cost). The value of some of these support licenses (as with tier 2 support provided by commercial software vendors) is dubious at best given that most support is completely dependent on tier 1 anyway (i.e. the systems integrator or internal IT staff).

I think tier 2 support is definitely warranted for some of the more complex solutions such as ESB, especially for the initial term until the teams gain more product depth, but a better long term solution is to work closely with an SI to leverage their capability to deliver tier 1 support that also incorporate some days-on-site support. Given that most of the tier 2 support is delivered remotely over the internet using issue management systems such as Jira etc. there is only so much they can deliver anyway. Thus (as with commercial products) it is critical to have a very capable tier 1 support capability delivered by an SI with specific skills in the product set deployed.
PermalinkPermalink 02/17/10 @ 20:19

Leave a comment:

Your email address will not be displayed on this site.
Your URL will be displayed.

Allowed XHTML tags: <p, ul, ol, li, dl, dt, dd, address, blockquote, ins, del, span, bdo, br, em, strong, dfn, code, samp, kdb, var, cite, abbr, acronym, q, sub, sup, tt, i, b, big, small>
(Line breaks become <br />)
(Set cookies for name, email and url)
(Allow users to contact you through a message form (your email will NOT be displayed.))
This is a captcha-picture. It is used to prevent mass-access by robots.
Please enter the characters from the image above. (case insensitive)

Hosted by:
hosted by PWS Consulting

The South East Asia SOA Weblog

The intention of this blog is to collect thoughts on the issues, paradigms, process, vendors, solutions, project and any other item related service oriented architecture in South East Asia.

July 2010
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
 << <   > >>
        1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30 31

Search

XML Feeds

What is RSS?

Who's Online?

  • Guest Users: 1